Reply from Constant Méheut, journalist for The New York Times
From: Constant Méheut (NYTimes)
Subject: New York Times
Date received: 2022-05-31 at 18:24 +0800 (China Standard Time)
Note: the email has been redacted for privacy. Also, READ THIS: https://www.tojournalists.com/open-letters/explanations-sent-to-constant-meheut-may-25-2022/
Dear Mr. [ Vincent B. Le Corre ],
Thank you very much for your emails. To be honest, I have to admit it’s a little bit difficult to follow and I am not sure I understand, yet, the link between everything you told me so far. I did understand, though, the “one chance out of four” fraud, but I am not sure I understand the other information you sent to me.
I am going to take the time to look at all of this in more detail, but if you could sum it all up in a few sentences, I would definitely appreciate it.
Kind regards,
–
Constant Méheut
The New York Times - Paris Bureau
+33 6 [Phone number, REDACTED FOR PRIVACY] / +33 1 [Phone number, REDACTED FOR PRIVACY]
@ConstantMeheut - Stories
To gain a clearer understanding of the sequence of events in this case, I invite you to view a detailed timeline at the following link:
https://www.ECTHRwatch.org/timeline/mcdonalds/
This timeline provides a comprehensive overview of the key milestones and developments.
